Tuesday, May 15, 2012

Dirty Dancing

High school dances have evolved through the generations. What used to be called a “sock hop” or a “mixer” has maintained its social purpose, but because the attitudes of young people have changed drastically. Today’s popular culture is laden with sex. Sex is everywhere. It is on our house, on our back porch, and jumps out from behind trees when we least expect it. Most prevalently, it is in our music. With songs like “Wetter” by Lil’ Wayne on our ipods, it is encouraging sex among the youth of America. This change has also changed the way we dance. Dancing used to be considered an art, a form of expression through physical movement. Now our high school semi formal, homecoming dance, and prom has become what I like to call a “grindfest”. Grinding is a form of dancing similar to that seen in rap music videos. The man takes the woman by the hips and the woman glues her hind-quarters to the man’s crotchal region. The two move to the music with much friction between them. It is as awkward to see as it is to do. This manner of close quarters, hot, and sweaty dancing really baffles me. I don’t understand how rubbing your junk all up on a girl’s booty for 3 to 4 hours to some crappy song about big booty chicks is a fun time. Call me old fashion, but the days when you could win a woman’s heart with your impressive dance steps were the days when chivalry and class ruled. Those days are over now. They have been replaced with the romantic songs such as “Lollipop” and “The Thong Song”.

6 comments:

  1. Last group: The names and relations were sometimes inconsistant. Seemed like the connection was strong. So was some of the language. Started out school appropriate, but you might's wanted it to stay that way. It was very funny, nonetheless, and the characters were well preformed by all group members!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Group Kardashian: Connor, Scott, Sam, Stephen had excellent delivery of their lines. Excellent interpretation of dialogue. Sometimes would revert to very formal tone that is incongruent to interpretation. Irony and corny puns are a nice touch. Shady censorship. Excellent use of props, especially by Scott and Stephen. Group knows how to push its limits. Terrific execution for the amount of practice they had. Audience is very engaged most, which is a nice sign. Mr. Kefor was terrified. “Wow”.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Group 4-Amelia M. feedback

    -Good theme and context
    -All of the group members were on task
    -Had some original meaning of the play, but context was different
    -Funny scenes made the play funny and interesting to watch
    -Group members got into character
    -Some parts were confusing to follow
    -I enjoyed most of the scenes
    -Batman didn’t really have anything to do with the play
    -Good job overall

    ReplyDelete
  4. group 4:
    This Play was very funny and group was on task most of the time.There were definitely some really good parts in it, but also some parts were written a little bit sloppy.

    ReplyDelete
  5. For Group 4: You did an overall good job in translating the play into the kardashians, but at some points you could have modernized the parts better, instead of consistently switching from lamar being their dad and then to being the brother in law. It was really funny though. Most of you did really good job acting! And Scott did a really good job from switching his roles. The meaning was shown. Pretty good job!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Great job on the play! I liked how your part really matched up with how the kardashians would talk. Also the giant butt was very funny, and I liked how we were able to save the play at the end from all the odd use of swear words, but good job!

    ReplyDelete